BALLOT OFFERS VARIETY OF CHANCES TO MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD
Lots of interesting things on the ballot this Tuesday.
Here’s my take on a few of them.
Amendment 39: Vote yes.
I wish this amendment weren’t necessary. School
districts all over the country have become bloated with mid-level bureaucrats,
precisely because they are tax-supported unnatural monopolies. Once we
get vouchers, measures like 39 can go away: Market pressures and the
threat of parents taking their money elsewhere will keep schools focusing on
what they’re supposed to.
Sure, the education establishment opposes 39. They also oppose vouchers, and they hate No Child Left Behind. Guess what, guys? By fighting us tooth and nail on the voucher issue, you get NCLB and Amendment 39. I suppose you think anything is bearable, as long as you get your subsidy.
We’ll see.
Amendment 40: Vote no.
I’m a big fan of term limits for elected officials.
It’s good for legislators to be drawn from and return to the ranks of society
to live under the laws they make.
But for the judiciary, it’s different. The function of
judges is to interpret the law. The judiciary can then serve as a useful
counterbalance to legislative excess.
This system of checks and balances can only work if the
judiciary is independent, insulated from the political process as much as
possible. Yes, the Supreme Court of Colorado is pretty liberal. As
far as I can tell, that’s why Amendment 40 is on the ballot. But this too
shall pass. In the mean time, I’d rather live with the imperfections of a
liberal court than those of a politically appointed one.
Amendment 41: Vote no.
This is a “motherhood” Amendment. Voting against
ethics in government is like voting against motherhood. Who could
possibly be opposed? Well, me.
Campaign finance reform, ethics legislation, lobbying
regulations, all those eventually become tools for political gamesmanship, or
else they’re ignored thanks to unforeseen loopholes. That’s not cynicism, it’s
observation.
Measures like Amendment 41 make us feel good about
ourselves, but they don’t accomplish anything important. They address the
symptom but not the disease. They distract us from the real question:
Exactly what should government do?
Right now, there’s an enormous pile of cheese in the middle
of the statehouse floor. Voters are being called in to do something about
the mouse problem. No thanks. Better to ask what all that fermented
curd is doing there in the first place.
Amendment 42: Vote no. It’s not right to make
some people give others more money. Even if there’s more of us.
Even if they’re big bad corporations. Even if we just really, really want
them to. Nor do minimum wage laws work. They throw everyone who’s
worth less than minimum wage out on the street.
For a policy idea to make it into law, it’s got to pass the
“heart” test (Is it right on principle?) and the “head” test (Will it
work?). Amendment 42 fails both.
Amendment 43 and Referendum I. The ACLU tells me I
should vote no on 43, but yes on I. Focus on the Family tells me I should
vote yes on 43 but no on I. Neither of those positions make sense to
me. I’m voting yes on both.
My gay friends will complain about “heterosexual
privilege”. Sorry, guys and gals, but it takes both to make a baby.
Heterosexuality isn’t a “social construct”, it’s how human life creates and
renews itself. Defining “marriage” as a union between a man and a woman
just makes sense to me. I admit it, I’m a “heterosexist.” So sue
me.
But why shouldn’t gay men and women be encouraged to form
monogamous relationships? Anything that encourages responsibility and
discourages sexual promiscuity ought to be supported, particularly among gay
men.
I know it’s a stereotype, but all the research I’ve seen
shows that multiple partners and risky sexual behavior are more prominent among
gay men than any other group. I’m thinking that’s because they’re, well,
guys. If Referendum I encourages more people to behave responsibly, I’m
all for it.
One last thing: Read your voter information carefully
the night before. When you vote, think of your fellow citizens in uniform
who help make it possible. Tell ‘em thanks if you remember. See you
at the polls!